December 2009

Income Tax Case Laws, Sec. 260A, Sec. 28(i), Section 56

Calcutta H.C : Whether the interest income by way of investment of the surplus funds generated and arising from the carrying on of the business of growing and manufacturing tea should be treated as incidental to the tea business and/or as part of the income derived from the tea business for the purpose of r. 8 of the IT Rules, 1962 ?

High Court Of Calcutta Eveready Industries India Ltd. vs. CIT & Anr. Section 28(i), 56, 260A, IT Rule 8 Asst.

Sec. 276AB, Section 279

Madras H.C : The property transferred is one single unit for a consideration of Rs. 40 lakhs and therefore, the provisions of Chapter XX-C of the Act clearly apply to the said transaction and the accused have contravened the provisions of s. 269UC and s. 269UL(2) of the Act, which is punishable under s. 276AB of the Act

High Court Of Madras Soffia Software Ltd. & Anr. vs. Mrs. Kalpagam Bhaskaran, Member, Appropriate Authority Section 276AB, 279 K.

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security