Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

June 2009

Section 22, Sec. 28(i)

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether lease rent received from school building along with playground etc., is business income of company?

Avijit Das / June 25, 2009

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh CIT Vs. Doris Educational & Commercial Services (P.) Ltd. Assessment Year : 1994-95 Section : […]

Bombay H.C : the Tribunal was legally correct in placing reliance on the decision of Bombay High Court in the case of Alfa Laval India Ltd. vs. Dy. CIT (supra), which has held that ‘having accepted interest income as part of the business profits, the same could not be excluded from business profits, while calculating deduction under s. 80HHC of the IT Act’, which is not the question involved in the present case

Avijit Das / June 23, 2009

High Court Of Bombay At Goa CIT vs. Damodar Mangalji Mining Co. Section 263 Asst. Year 1993-94 B.P. Dharmadhikari &

Bombay H.C : Whether the interest income received by a co- operative bank from investments made in Kisan Vikas Patra (‘KVP’ for short) and Indira Vikas Patra (‘IVP’ for short) out of voluntary reserves is income from banking business exempt under s. 80P(2)(a)(i) of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Avijit Das / June 16, 2009

High Court Of Bombay CIT vs. Solapur Nagari Audyogic Sahakari Bank Ltd. & Ors. Section 80P(2)(a)(i) V.C. Daga & J.P.

Bombay H.C : The interest paid of Rs. 1,66,959 for discounting the bills with the banks during the course of the business activities was not allowable in computing the business income under s. 37 of IT Act, 1961

Avijit Das / June 15, 2009

High Court Of Bombay Dipti Textile Industries vs. CIT Section 37(1) Asst. Year 1983-84 V.C. Daga & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.

Bombay H.C : The Tribunal was justified in upholding the order of the CIT (respondent No. 2) in exercising revisional power vested in him under s. 263 of the IT Act, 1961 whereby respondent No. 2 set aside the assessment order passed by the AO

Avijit Das / June 15, 2009

High Court Of Bombay Jewel Of India vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. Section 263 V.C. Daga &

Bombay H.C : The petitioners have challenged the order passed under s. 269UD(1) of the IT Act, 1961 by the Appropriate Authority for purchase of the property belonging to the petitioner Nos. 1 and 2 and agreed to be sold to the petitioner Nos. 3 and

Avijit Das / June 15, 2009

High Court Of Bombay Dattaram Bhikai Telge & Ors. vs. Appropriate Authority & Ors. Section 269UD F.I. Rebello & J.H.

Sec. 37(1), Section 37

Bombay H.C : The interest paid of Rs. 1,66,959 for discounting the bills with the banks during the course of the business activities was not allowable in computing the business income under s. 37 of IT Act, 1961

Avijit Das / June 15, 2009

High Court Of Bombay Dipti Textile Industries vs. CIT Section 37(1) Asst. Year 1983-84 V.C. Daga & J.P. Devadhar, JJ.

Karnataka H.C : Director of Company Not Liable u/s 179 to pay penalty and interest

Avijit Das / June 15, 2009

High Court Of Karnataka Ebrahim Vs. DCIT, Circle-I, Shimoga Section : 179 Ajit J. Gunjal, J. Writ Petition No. 9314

Bombay H.C : whether the Tribunal was right in dismissing the appeal and thereby confirming the disallowance of Rs. 11,83,697 being education expenses incurred in respect of a trainee during the course of the appellant’s business ?

Avijit Das / June 12, 2009

High Court Of Bombay Echjay Forgings Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Section 37 Asst. Year 1998-99 V.C. Daga

Section 145, Section 254

Karnataka H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the appellant’s case, the order of the Tribunal is not one of perverse ?

Avijit Das / June 12, 2009

High Court Of Karnataka Sri Vaddanahal Rajanna (HUF) vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Section 145, 254 V. Gopala Gowda

Post pagination

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top