Delhi H.C : the assessee did not co-operate during the year 2003-04 and the Department had to levy the penalty under s. 271(1)(b)
High Court Of Delhi Surya Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. CIT & Ors. Section 127 T.S. Thakur & J.M. Malik, JJ. Writ […]
High Court Of Delhi Surya Pharmaceuticals Ltd. vs. CIT & Ors. Section 127 T.S. Thakur & J.M. Malik, JJ. Writ […]
High Court Of Delhi Nitin Developers & Const. vs. CIT Section 127(2) T.S. Thakur & Shiv Narayan Dhingra, JJ. Writ
High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Roshan Singh Makker Section 113, proviso Block period 1st April, 1990 to
High Court Of Delhi Berger Paints India Ltd. vs. CIT Section 35D Asst. Year 1997-98 T.S. Thakur & Shiv Narayan
High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Roxy Industrial Corporation Sections 80HHC, 154 Asst. Year 1995-96 Adarsh Kumar Goel
High Court Of Allahabad Subharati Krishan Kumar Bhatnagar Charitable Trust & Anr. vs. CIT & ANR. Section 80G(5), ART. 226
High Court Of Rajasthan CIT vs. Munni Lal & Company Sections 201(1), 201(1), proviso, 201(1A), 221, 231 Asst. Years 1974-75,
High Court Of Calcutta Bal Chand Purohit & Anr. vs. CIT & Ors. Section 127 Pinaki Chandra Ghose & Tapan
High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Agro Chemicals (India) Section 271(1)(c) Asst. Year 1988-89 Adarsh Kumar Goel &
High Court Of Rajasthan : Jaipur Bench Ram Niwas Meena vs. CIT Section 273A Asst. Year 1985-86, 1986-87, 1987-88, 1988-89