August 2003

Sec. 276C, Section 277

Madras H.C : This revision has been filed against the order passed in Crl. MP No. 5432 of 2001, in CC No. 688 of 1989 on the file of the Judicial Magistrate No. III, Salem, dismissing the petition for discharge filed by the petitioner herein against whom a complaint has been given by the ITO, Circle I, Salem, for the offences punishable under ss. 193,196, 420 of the IPC, and ss. 276C(1) and 277 r/w s. 278C of the IT Act, 1961.

High Court Of Madras V. Sadasiva Chetty (HUF) vs. Income Tax Officer Section 276C, 277, CrPC 245, CrPC 397 Asst.

Section 4

Kerala H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and after having found that ‘there was failure on the part of the assessee to disclose the cash balance of Rs. 80,000 as agricultural income even for rate purposes’, the Tribunal is right in law and fact in holding that there is nothing wrong in accepting the cash balance shown by the assessee?

High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. Jibie K. John Section 4 Asst. Year 1984-85 G. Sivarajan & Kurian Joseph, JJ.

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security