Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

May 2003

Sec. 5(2), Sec. 9(1)(vi), Section 5, Section 9, Section 90

Madhya Pradesh H.C : Whether the Tribunal is justified in not accepting the claim of the Revenue that there should have been deduction of tax at source under s. 195 of the IT Act, 1961, in regard to the remittance of 25,000 US $ to M/s PCIKingwood, USA, treating the said amount as royalty?

Avijit Das / May 5, 2003

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh CIT vs. Heg Ltd. Sections 5(2), 9(1)(vi), 90(2), DTAA Art. 12 Asst. year 1993-94 Dipak […]

Gift Tax Act, Sec. 2 (XXIV), Sec. 2(XII)

Gujarat H.C : Whether in law on facts, the assessee is liable to pay tax under the GT Act,1958, on account of the variations made on 31st Dec., 1970, in the settlement deed of 1961 ?

Avijit Das / May 3, 2003

High Court Of Gujarat Commissioner Of Gift Tax vs. Nandkishore Sakarlal Sections GT 2(xii), GT 2(xxiv) Asst. Year 1971-72 R.K.

S.C : These two appeals arise out of the final judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi in Crl. Misc. (M) Nos. 360/2002 and 447/2002 filed under s. 482 of the CrPC r/w Art. 227 of the Constitution of India by the appellants herein seeking the invocation of the inherent powers of the High Court for quashing the FIRs

Avijit Das / May 2, 2003

Supreme Court Of India Hira Lal Hari Lal Bhagwati vs. Central Bureau Of Investigation Sections 1998FA (No. 2) 91, 95(ii)(a),

Sec. 260A, Section 260

Rajasthan H.C : Having heard learned counsel for the appellant, we are of the opinion that in this appeal no question of law much less substantial question of law arises for consideration.

Avijit Das / May 1, 2003

High Court Of Rajasthan Kansara Bearings (P) Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Sections 260A Asst. Year 1990-91 Rajesh

Sec. 260A, Section 68

Rajasthan H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case the Tribunal was justified in law in deleting the addition of Rs. 21.76 lacs on account of unexplained share application money by relying or the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court which is distinguishable in the facts of the case ?

Avijit Das / May 1, 2003

High Court Of Rajasthan CIT vs. Shree Barkha Synthetics Ltd. Sections 68, 260A Asst. year 1997-98 Rajesh Balia & O.P.

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 5 6

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top