October 2002

Sec. 32(1), Sec. 43(1), Section 32, Section 43

Kerala H.C : These two appeals are filed by the CIT, Thiruvananthapuram, against a common order of the Tribunal, Cochin Bench, in ITA No. 756/Coch/1995, ITA Nos. 446/Coch/1998 and 447/Coch/1998. ITA No. 756/1995 before the Tribunal was filed by the respondent-assessee in respect of the asst. yr. 1992-93 and ITA Nos. 446 & 447 of 1998 were filed by the Department in respect of the asst. yrs. 1994-95 and 1995-96

High Court Of Kerala CIT vs. Victory Acqa Farm Ltd. Sections 32(1), 43(3) Asst. years 1992-93, 1994-95, 1995-96 G. Sivarajan

Section 276, Section 278, Section 278B

Punjab & Haryana H.C : This is a petition under s. 482 of the CPC., for quashing the complaint Annexure P1 dt. 25th Jan., 1991, filed under s. 276DD r/w s. 278B of the IT Act, 1961, and order dt. 25th March, 1991, Annexure P2, passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur, vide which the petitioners were summoned in this case.

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Mohan Singh & Ors. vs. Income Tax Officer Section 276DD, 278B, CPC 482 Ashutosh

Section 276, Section 276B

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The brief facts of the case are that the complainant filed a complaint Annexure P1, before the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ferozepur, alleging that the petitioners, who are running the firm in the name of Dua Rice Mills at Fazilka, took a loan of Rs. 1,20,000 on different dates from two persons, namely, Angrej Singh and Smt. Ajit Kaur. That amount was taken in cash and not through “account payee cheques/bank drafts.” Thus, according to the complainant, the petitioners committed an offence punishable under s. 269SS of the IT Act, 1961.

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Mohan Singh & Ors. vs. ITO Section 276DD, 278B, CPC 482 Ashutosh Mohunta, J.

Scroll to Top
Malcare WordPress Security