Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

July 2002

Section 276B, Section 278B

Madhya Pradesh H.C : They were charged and prosecuted for the commission of offence punishable under ss. 276B and 278B

Avijit Das / July 2, 2002

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh : Indore Bench Union Of India vs. Pyarelal Tarachand & Anr. Sections 276B, 278B Asst. […]

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the assessee is entitled to interest under s. 214 of the IT Act, 1961, on the net refund amount determined with Rs. 1,95,951 ?

Avijit Das / July 2, 2002

High Court Of Madras Eimco Kcp Ltd. vs. CIT Section 214 Asst. Year 1979-80 V.S. Sirpurkar & N.V. Balasubramanian, JJ.

Madras H.C : The assessees, who are transport contractors and entitled for payment for carriage of goods, were aggrieved by the action of the IT authorities in seeking to deduct the amount at source by invoking s. 194C of the Act.

Avijit Das / July 2, 2002

High Court Of Madras Central Board Of Direct Taxes & Ors. vs. Sri Saradha Transport & Ors. Sections 194C B.

Income Tax Case Laws

Gujarat H.C : The petitioners, in these petitions under Art. 226 of the Constitution of India, have challenged the orders dt. 25th Feb., 1999, and 23rd Feb., 1999, respectively, passed by the designated authority rejecting the petitioners’ declaration filed under s. 89

Avijit Das / July 2, 2002

High Court Of Gujarat Manibhai Prabhudas Patel & Anr. vs. L.K. Koolwal, Designated Authority Sections 1998FA (No. 2) 95(i)(b) Asst.

Income Tax Case Laws

Rajasthan H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that the drilling machines used by the assessee should be treated as earth-moving machinery, falling under entry 4 of the item III-D of Part I of Appendix I of the IT Rules, 1962, and, therefore, entitled to depreciation at 30 per cent ?

Avijit Das / July 2, 2002

High Court Of Rajasthan Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax vs. Vipin Doshi Sections RULE, Appexdix I, Part I, Entry No.

Sec. 144B, Section 144, Section 153

Madras H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in holding that the assessment made in the case was not barred by limitation ?

Avijit Das / July 2, 2002

High Court Of Madras K.S. Venkataraman & Co. (P) Ltd. vs. CIT Sections 144B, 153, Expln 1(iv) Asst. Year 1978-79

Rajasthan H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in directing the WTO to arrive at the value of the immovable property by applying r. 1BB and further in directing if the value arrived at by applying r. 1BB does not exceed the value as per the books by 20 per cent, then he shall not apply r. 2B(2) in respect of immovable property?

Avijit Das / July 1, 2002

High Court Of Rajasthan Commissioner Of Wealth Tax vs. Shyam Mohan Rawat Sections WT Rule 1BB, WT Rule 2B(2) Y.R.

Sec. 276AB, Section 276

Madras H.C : The case of the prosecution is that Appu Hotels Ltd., Chennai, was the owner of the lands situate at door No. 1, West Cott Road, Royapettah, in an extent of ten grounds and 1,267 square feet

Avijit Das / July 1, 2002

High Court Of Madras R. Vijayalakshmi vs. Appu Hotels Ltd. & Ors. Section 276AB A.K. Rajan, J. Crl. Appeal No.

Post pagination

← Previous 1 … 10 11

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top