Skip to content

taxcaselaw.com

My account

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

taxcaselaw.com

Cart
Checkout
My account
Shop

October 2000

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The petitioners have prayed for quashing of the notices issued by the Asstt CIT (Investigation Circle-II), Ambala, under s. 226(3) of the IT Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”), for attachment of other accounts.

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Paras Rice Mills & Ors. vs. CIT & Ors. Section 132(8), 132(10) G.S. Singhvi […]

Section 147, Section 148, Section 149

Punjab & Haryana H.C : This is a petition for quashing of the notices dt. 4th March, 2000, issued by the ITO, Ward No. 1, Sirsa, (respondent No. 1) under s. 148 of the IT Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”), for assessment/reassessment of the income of the petitioner in relation to the asst. yrs. 1993-94, 1994-95 and 1995-96.

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Grover Nursing Home vs. Income Tax Officer & Ors. Sections 147, 148, 149 Asst.

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was correct in holding that on a true interpretation of cl. 8 of the partnership deed dt. 19th July, 1971 and cl. 9 of the partnership deed dt. 26th May, 1972, there was no partnership in existence and what was evident was only an employer-employee relationship in the garb of partnership ?

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Delhi K.B. & Co. vs. CIT Sections 2(23), 184 Asst. years 1973-74, 1974-75 Arijit Pasayat, C.J. &

Sec. 260A, Section 260, Section 69

Punjab & Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the impugned diary of the property dealer recording actual transactions in the properties located in that very area had no evidentiary value ?

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana CIT vs. Nitin Kumar Sections 69, 260A G.S. Singhvi & Nirmal Singh, JJ. IT

Sec. 271(1)(c ), Section 271

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and having regard to the fact that the assessee agreed to be assessed on an income of Rs. 20,900, the Tribunal was right in holding that a penalty under s. 271(1)(c) could not be imposed ?

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. Mool Chand Siri Kishan Dass Section 271(1)(c) Asst. Year 1954-55 Arijit Pasayat, C.J. &

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the disallowance of the loss of Rs. 2,00,000 claimed by the assessee, as capital loss ?

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Delhi Distillersâ€™ Trading Corpn. Ltd. vs. CIT Section 28 Asst. Year 1973-74 Arijit Pasayat, C.J. & D.K.

Sec. 132(1), Section 132

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The petitioners have prayed for quashing of the notices issued by the Asstt CIT (Investigation Circle-II), Ambala, under s. 226(3) of the IT Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”), for attachment of other accounts.

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Paras Rice Mills & Ors. vs. CIT & Ors. Section 132(8), 132(10) G.S. Singhvi

Section 215, Section 217

Madras H.C : This writ petition is filed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the petitioner on the file of the first respondent in C. No. 1742/1/89/90/Central II, dt. 20th Sept., 1989, and to quash the impugned order passed therein and consequently direct the first respondent to grant relief of waiver of interest to the petitioner for the asst. yr. 1985-86.

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Madras Coromendal Indag Products India Ltd. vs. CIT & Anr Sections 215, 217(1)(a), Rule 40 Asst. Year

Kerala H.C : The challenge in the original petition is with regard to Ext. P3 order passed by the Income-tax Settlement Commission, Madras, refusing registration for the firm represented by the petitioner under s. 184 of the IT Act, 1961.

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Kerala K.T. Mathew vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax & Anr. Sections 184 M.R. Hariharan Nair, J.

Section 215, Section 217

Madras H.C : This writ petition is filed for the issue of a writ of certiorarified mandamus calling for the records relating to the petitioner on the file of the first respondent in C. No. 1742/1/89/90/Central II, dt. 20th Sept., 1989, and to quash the impugned order passed therein and consequently direct the first respondent to grant relief of waiver of interest to the petitioner for the asst. yr. 1985-86.

Avijit Das / October 31, 2000

High Court Of Madras Coromendal Indag Products India Ltd. vs. CIT & Anr Sections 215, 217(1)(a), Rule 40 Asst. Year

Post pagination

1 2 … 5 Next →

Copyright © 2024 taxcaselaw.com | Powered by Astra WordPress Theme

Scroll to Top