Month: September 2000

Punjab & Haryana H.C : The petitioner filed a return for the asst. yr. 1991-92 declaring an income of Rs. 2,890. It claimed deduction under s. 80-I of the Act on the premise that it had set up a new industrial unit

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Gurera Gas Cylinders (P) Ltd. vs. CIT & ANR. Sections 147, 148, Art. 226 Asst. Year 1991-92 G.S. Singhvi & Nirmal Singh, JJ. Civil Writ Petn. No. 9208 of 1996 29th September, 2000 Counsel Appeared A.K. Mittal, for the Petitioner : R.P. Sawhney with Rajesh Bindal, for the Respondents JUDGMENT …

S.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in cancelling the order passed under s. 186(1) of the IT Act, 1961 ?

Supreme Court Of India CIT vs. Friends & Co. Sections 184, 186 S.P. Bharucha, S.N. Phukan & Shivaraj V. Patil, JJ. Civil Appeal No. 498 of 1998 19th September, 2000 Counsel Appeared M.L. Verma with S.W.A. Quadri & Ms. Sushma Suri, for the Appellant : A.V. Rangam & A. Ranganathan, for the Respondent ORDER By the …

Delhi H.C : The petitioner has approached this Court under s. 482 of the Cr.PC for setting aside/quashing the order dt. 20th Aug., 1998, passed by Shri M.K. Gupta, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Delhi, in Criminal Complaint No. 5164/89 (Case No. 198/94) titled as ITO vs. Radhey Shyam Aggarwal.

High Court Of Delhi Dr. Radhey Shayam Aggarwal vs. State & Anr. Sections 269SS, 276DD Asst. Year 1987-88 Dalveer Bhandari, J. Crl. Misc. No. 2982 of 1998 15th September, 2000 Counsel Appeared Ms. Shyamla Pappu with M.R. Krishnamurthy, for the Petitioner : Ms. Mukta Gupta & R.D. Jolly, for the Respondents JUDGMENT DALVEER BHANDARI, J.: The …

Punjab And Haryana H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in law in confirming the order of the CIT(A) deleting the penany levied under s. 271(1)(c) of the Act?

High Court Of Punjab And Haryana CIT vs. Dhillon Rice Mills Section 256(2) Asst. Year 1988-89 G.S. Singhvi & Nirmal Singh, JJ. ITC No. 44 of 1999 14th September, 2000 Counsel Appeared R.P. Sawhney with Rajesh Bindal, for the Revenue JUDGMENT G.S. SLNGHVI, J. : In this petition filed under s. 256(2) of the Income-tax Act, …

Delhi H.C : Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal is correct in law in allowing depreciation on the amount invested in the purchase of godown-cum-showroom situated at 95, Nehru Place, New Delhi in spite of the fact that it was not registered in the name of the assessee-company ?

High Court Of Delhi CIT vs. National Co-Operative Consumer’s Federation Ltd. Sections 4, 10(3), 32 Asst. Year 1972-73, 1977-78 Arijit Pasayat, C.J. & D.K. Jain, J. IT Ref. Nos. 20, 123-125, 270, 320 of 1978, 318 of 1979 & 147 & 148 of 1983 12th September, 2000 Counsel Appeared R.C. Pandey and Mrs. Prem Lata Bansal, …

Punjab & Haryana H.C : the conviction and sentence of the accused-Mahender Kumar for an offence punishable under s. 278 of IT Act, 1961, but maintained the conviction and sentence for an offence punishable under s. 277

High Court Of Punjab & Haryana Mahender Kumar vs. ITO Sections 277 Asst. Year 1977-78 V.K. Bali, J. Criminal Revision No. 1212 of 1987 1st September, 2000 Counsel Appeared B.S. Gupta with Sanjay Bansal, for the Petitioner : R.P. Sahney with Sanjiv Ghai & Rajesh Bindal, for the Respondent ORDER V.K. BALI, J. : Challenge in …
Malcare WordPress Security