Month: August 2000

Madhya Pradesh H.C : The petitioners have challenged the notice issued by respondent No. 1 under s. 158BC of the IT Act, after search was conducted on petitioners’ premises under the provisions of s. 132 of the Act

High Court Of Madhya Pradesh: Indore Bench Khemchand Chandwan vs. DCIT Section 158BC N.K. Jain, J. Writ Petn. No. 882 of 2000 19th August, 2000 Counsel Appeared P.M. Choudhary, for the Petitioners : Patankar, for the Respondent JUDGMENT N.K. JAIN, J. : Heard. The petitioners have challenged the notice issued by respondent No. 1 under s. …

Karnataka H.C : The appellants were not entitled to invoke the discretionary jurisdiction of this Court under Arts. 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India to cancel the order made by the Tribunal as an alternate remedy of appeal provided under s. 260A

High Court Of Karnataka L. Sohanraj & Ors. vs. DCIT & Anr. Section 260A, Art. 226, Art. 227 Asst. Year 1989-90, 1990-91, 1991-92, 1992-913, 1993-94 Ashok Bhan, Actg. C.J. & R. Gururajan, J. Writ Appeal Nos. 3852 to 55 of 2000 3rd August, 2000 Counsel Appeared : Madhusudan R. Naik, for the Petitioners : M.V. Seshachala, …
Malcare WordPress Security